The factors responsible for daily increment formation have been
well studied, and are summarized in Campana and Neilson
(1985).
In brief, the increments form as a result of an endogenous circadian
rhythm, or internal clock, which is initially entrained by a 24-hour
light-dark cycle. The light-dark cycle is not required for daily
increment formation after entrainment. Environmental fluctuations such as feeding, activity and in particular temperature variations,
can all interact to produce increments in addition to those of the
daily cycle: these are often referred to as subdaily increments.
However, the environmental cycles more often serve to reinforce the
endogenous daily cycle, thus producing clear and regularly-spaced
increments in natural environments. The only instances where daily
increments do not appear to form each and every day is under
conditions of poor growth and in adult fishes.
Studies of the otolith microstructure provide much more than just
age and growth information. Since the date of fish death
(corresponding to the outermost increment in the otolith) is known,
the number of daily increments can be used to calculate the exact
date of hatch. Hatch date frequencies in turn can be used to estimate
spawning times, based only on collections of juveniles. The ages
and dates of certain life history events (eg- metamorphosis from the
larva to the juvenile) are also recorded in the microstructure,
through a change in increment width and appearance. And since
otolith growth is often proportional to fish growth, the width of a
daily
increment is
roughly
proportional to
the
growth
of the
fish on
that
day.
Such
growth
backcalculations are powerful applications of the otolith, and are often used
to reconstruct the daily growth history in relationship to the
environment. Other applications include studies of recruitment,
mortality rate and thermal mass marking. Indeed, the otolith
microstructure can generally be used to provide date- or age-structured information to any application, including probe-based
elemental analyses. These and other applications are described in
detail in Campana and Jones (1992).
All microstructural examinations are directed towards a view of the
internal structure. In very small otoliths (eg- those less than 40 µm
in diameter), simple microscopic examination on a glass slide may
be sufficient. However, some form of otolith preparation is
generally required. This can take the form of polishing to remove
surface material, or embedding and sectioning. The end product in
both cases is a cross section of the otolith. Examination of the
growth increments is always made with a compound microscope,
since increment widths are generally less than 10 µm.
The information that can be gained from examination of the otolith
microstructure of a young fish is immense. However, the learning
curve for preparing and interpreting the otoliths should not be
underestimated: it is time-consuming. We strongly recommend the
book Otolith Microstructure Examination and Analysis, by
Stevenson and Campana, as an all-in-one guide to the field. This book can
be downloaded, and additional methodological instructions viewed, on the
following page: Otolith Microstructure Methods